Numerous studies have shown that flu shots simply do not work.
PROOF:
- According to the 2006 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 51 separate studies concluded the flu vaccine worked no better than a placebo in 260,000 children ranging in age from six months to 23 months.
- A study published in the October 2008 Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine found flu vaccines in young children have made no difference in the number of flu-related doctor and hospital visits.
- As reported in a 2004 publication of the Archives of Disease in Childhood, a study of 800 children with asthma concluded those receiving a flu vaccine had a significantly increased risk of asthma-related doctor and emergency room visits.[6]
- A more recent study released at the 2009 American Thoracic Society International Conference showed children with asthma who received FluMist had a 3-fold increased risk for hospitalization.[7]
And not only are vaccines ineffective in preventing flu in your children, they are equally useless for adults, including the elderly.
- According to the 2007 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, studies of over 65,000 healthy adults concluded vaccinations reduced the risk of flu by only six percent, and reduced missed work days by less than a single day. Vaccinations did not reduce the number of people who sought medical help or took time off from work.[8]
- The 2006 Cochrane Database also includes a review of 64 vaccination studies of the elderly across nearly 100 flu seasons. The studies showed flu vaccines were ineffective in preventing the flu in either nursing home patients or elderly living in the community.[9]
- A study published in the Lancet last year found that influenza vaccination was NOT associated with a reduced risk of pneumonia in older people. This supports a study done five years ago, published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
- Research published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine also confirms that there has been no decrease in deaths from influenza and pneumonia, despite the fact that vaccination coverage among the elderly has increased from 15 percent in 1980 to 65 percent now.
Last year, researchers with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the National Institutes of Health published this conclusion in the Lancet Infectious Diseases:
“We conclude that frailty selection bias and use of non-specific endpoints such as all-cause mortality have led cohort studies to greatly exaggerate vaccine benefits.”
Flu Vaccines Pose Significant Health Risks to Your Children
PROOF: http://www.twine.com/item/12g0znkjm-28s/the-terrifying-world-of-vaccine-adjuvants
Most flu vaccines contain dangerous levels of mercury in the form of thimerosal, a deadly preservative that is 50 times more toxic than regular mercury.[10] If taken in high enough doses, it can result in long-term immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions.
Disorders associated with mercury poisoning include autism, attention deficit disorder, multiple sclerosis, and speech and language deficiencies.
The Institute of Medicine has warned that infants, children, and pregnant women should not be injected with thimerosal, and yet the majority of flu shots contain 25 micrograms of it.
It has been calculated that, by age two, American children have received 237 micrograms of mercury from vaccines alone, which far exceeds the current EPA “safe” level of 0.1 mcg/kg per day. But that’s not all. Other toxic substances found in various flu vaccines include:
Ethylene glycol (antifreeze) Neomycin and streptomycin (antibiotics) Resin and gelatin – known to cause allergic reactions Formaldehyde – a known cancer causing agent Aluminum — a neurotoxin linked to Alzheimer’s disease Polysorbate 80 (Tween80™) – which can cause severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis Phenol (carbolic acid) Triton X100 (detergent) Egg proteins (including avian viruses)
-
[...] here: Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? « Socio … Tagged as: archives, automotive, depopulation, flu-pandemic, health, humor, japan, lancet, [...]
Pingback by Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? « Socio … | Write What | July 29, 2009 |
-
[...] See the original post: Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? « Socio … [...]
Pingback by Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? « Socio … | North America Flu | July 29, 2009 |
-
The Hong KOng government will press on with a program of drug tests for students despite signs of growing opposition and worries about privacy laws being breached.
The scheme is set to be launched as a pilot program at 23 secondary schools in Tai Po in December, with a review of progress in the middle of next year. The main thrust of the scheme is to provide counseling for those who test positive.
But social workers have joined the Catholic Church in taking a stand against it, and Privacy Commissioner Roderick Woo Bun has said under-18s may not have the capacity to consent to tests and that the law does not allow parents or guardians to agree on their behalf.
Permanent Secretary for Education Raymond Wong Hung-chiu said yesterday the government is also concerned about privacy, which is why the Department of Justice was consulted before the government went public with its plans. And the testing will conform with the law, he insisted.
A spokesman for the Education Bureau said Woo has been contacted about his concerns. Bureau officials, along with the Security Bureau’s Narcotics Division, will soon explain to him plans for protecting privacy.
Wong is also confident there will not be lawsuits once the program begins because “we will explain to parents and students the reason for collecting the data and how they will be used. The government will put in place measures to protect personal data.”
Wong’s views received a measure of support from Hong Kong University assistant professor Eric Cheung Tat- ming. The Privacy Ordinance does not come into play, he said, as students have the right to refuse to be tested. Still, students should sign agreements to clarify their consent, and schools must explain how data will be used.
Social workers, meanwhile, worry that students identified as drug abusers will face expulsion or discrimination by school management.
Social welfare lawmaker Cheung Kwok-chu said more than half of 500 social workers polled see an invasion of privacy. They also feel that disclosure of test results should not rest with school authorities.
Deputy Secretary for Education Betty Ip Tsang Chui-hing and Commissioner for Narcotics Sally Wong Pik-yee have already talked with school-based social workers in Tai Po about their roles in the scheme, but what was said has not be revealed.
Principals, including those from several religious schools, yesterday reconfirmed a commitment to testing. “If we chicken out now, nothing can be done,” said Buddhist Hui Yuan College principal Sung Lim-ping. “So we should take the first step.”
Confucian Ho Kwok Pui Chun College board member Elaine Lee Bik-wah said: “In secondary education, privacy is not our main concern. It will do them good if we insist on this and be strict.”
The Catholic Church, however, continues to disapprove, with vicar- general Yeung Ming-cheung describing drug testing as negative.
Education Is a better alternative, he said.
Comment by 迷你倉 | August 12, 2009 |
-
[...] Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk Of Hospitalization For Flu, Study Suggests Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? History of Bird Flu and the Illuminati Depopulation Agenda by Dr. True Ott Flashback: Homeless [...]
Pingback by Nationwide Revolt Against Mass Swine Flu Vaccination Accelerates « Socio-Economics History Blog | August 19, 2009 |
-
[...] think so. In fact, vaccines can and have caused cancer in the past. Watch the 3rd video in the post Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? (It was made at Merck video). [...]
Pingback by German Health Expert: Does Swine Flu Vaccine Increase the Risk of Cancer? « Socio-Economics History Blog | August 24, 2009 |
Dr. Mercola
articles.mercola.com/