EARL NASH, WTFG National Soveriegnty Correspondent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“It’s news to you…”
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Militarization
includes the US Northern Command (NORTHCOM), established in October 2002, which
has air, land, and sea responsibility for the continent regardless of
Posse Comitatus limitations that no longer apply or sovereign borders that are
easily erased. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) also have large roles. So does the
FBI, CIA, all US spy
agencies, militarized state and local police, National Guard forces, and paramilitary
mercenaries like Blackwater USA. The
“The Militarization and Annexation of North America”
by Stephen
Lendman
Under Bush 42, the elected leaders of Canada, the US, and Mexico met secretly and expanded
the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with “deep integration” of a
more militarized tri-national Homeland Security force.
Taking shape under the
radar of the respective governments and without public knowledge or
consideration, the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP)—headquartered in
Washington—aims to integrate the three nations into a single political,
economic, and security bloc.
The SPP was launched at a meeting of Presidents George W. Bush and Vicente
Fox, and Prime Minister Paul Martin, in Waco, Texas, on March 31, 2005. The
official US web page describes the SPP as “. . . a White House-led initiative
among the United States and Canada and Mexico to increase security and to
enhance prosperity . . .” The SPP is not a law, or a treaty, or even a signed
agreement. All these would require public debate and participation of Congress.
The SPP was born in the “war on terror” era and reflects an inordinate
emphasis on US security as interpreted by the Department of Homeland Security.
Its accords mandate border actions, military and police training, modernization
of equipment, and adoption of new technologies, all under the logic of the US
counter-terrorism campaign. Former Head of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, along
with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of Finance Carlos
Gutierrez, were the three officials charged with attending SPP ministerial
conferences.
Measures to coordinate security pressured Mexico to militarize its
southern border. US military elements already operate inside Mexico and the DEA
and the FBI have initiated training programs for the Mexican Army (now involved
in the drug war), federal and state police, and intelligence units.
Stephen
Lendman states that a Pentagon briefing paper hinted at a US invasion if the
country became destabilized or the government faced the threat of being
overthrown because of “widespread economic and social chaos” that would
jeopardize US investments, access to oil, overall trade, and would create great
numbers of immigrants heading north.
Canada’s influential Department of National Defence; its new Chief of Defence
Staff, General Rick Hillier; and Defense Minister Gordon O’Connor are on board
as well. They’re committed to ramping up the nation’s military spending and
linking with America’s “war on terror.”
The SPP created the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) that serves
as an official tri-national SPP working group. The group is composed of
representatives of thirty giant North American companies, including General
Electric, Ford Motors, General Motors, Wal-Mart, Lockheed-Martin, Merck, and
Chevron.
NACC’s recommendations centered on “private sector involvement” being “a key
step to enhancing North America’s competitive position in global markets and is
the driving force behind innovation and growth.” The NACC stressed the
importance of establishing policies for maximum profits.
The US-guided agenda prioritizes corporate-friendly access to resources,
especially Canadian and Mexican oil and water. The NACC’s policy states that
“the prosperity of the United States relies heavily on a secure supply of
imported energy.”
US energy security is seen as a top priority encouraging
Canada and Mexico to allow privatization of state-run enterprises like Mexico’s
nationalized oil company, PEMEX. In January 2008, Halliburton signed a $683
million contract with PEMEX to drill fifty-eight new test holes in Chiapas and
Tabasco and take over maintenance of pipelines. This is the latest of $2 billion
in contracts Halliburton has received from PEMEX during Fox’s and current
Mexican president Felipe Calderone’s administrations, which the opposition warns
has become the public front for US monopoly capital privatization.
Connie Fogal of Canadian Action Party says, “The SPP is the hostile takeover
of the apparatus of democratic government . . . a coup d’etat over the
government operations of Canada, US and Mexico.”
A fourth SPP summit was held in New Orleans from April 22 to 24, 2008. George
Bush, Canada’s Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and Mexico’s President Felipe
Calderon attended. Protesters held what they called a “people’s summit.” They
were in the streets and held workshops to inform people how destructive SPP is,
strengthen networking and organizational ties against it, maintain online
information about their activities, promote efforts and build added support, and
affirm their determination to continue resisting a hugely repressive
corporate-sponsored agenda.
Opponents call the “Partnership” NAFTA on steroids. Business-friendly
opposition also exists. The prominent Coalition to Block the North American
Union (NAU) is backed by the Conservative Caucus, which has a “NAU War Room,” a
“headquarters of the national campaign to expose and halt America’s absorption
into a North American Union with Canada and Mexico.” It opposes building “a
massive, continental ‘NAFTA Superhighway.’”
This coalition has congressional allies, and on January 2007, Rep. Virgil
Goode and six co-sponsors introduced House Concurrent Resolution 40, which
expresses “the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in
(building a NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a NAU with Mexico and
Canada.”
The April summit reaffirmed SPP’s intentions—to create a borderless North
America, dissolve national sovereignty, put corporate giants in control, and
assure big US companies most of it. It’s also to create fortress-North America
by militarizing the continent under US command.
SPP maintains a website. Its “key accomplishments” since August 2007 are
updated as of April 22, 2008. The information is too detailed for this update,
but can be accessed from the following link: http://www.spp.gov/pdf/key_accomplishments_since_august_2007.pdf.
The website lists principles agreed to; bilateral deals struck; negotiations
concluded; study assessments released; agreements on the “Free Flow of
Information”; law enforcement activities; efforts related to intellectual
property, border and long-haul trucking enforcement; import licensing
procedures; food and product safety issues; energy issues (with special focus on
oil); infrastructure development; emergency management; and much more. It’s all
laid out in deceptively understated tones to hide its continental aim—to enable
enhanced corporate exploitation with as little public knowledge as possible.
Militarization includes the US Northern Command (NORTHCOM), established in
October 2002, which has air, land, and sea responsibility for the continent
regardless of Posse Comitatus limitations that no longer apply or sovereign
borders that are easily erased. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and
its Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) also have large roles. So does the
FBI, CIA, all US spy agencies, militarized state and local police, National
Guard forces, and paramilitary mercenaries like Blackwater USA.
They’re headed anywhere on the continent with license to operate as freely as
in Iraq and New Orleans post-Katrina. They’ll be able to turn hemispheric
streets into versions of Baghdad and make them unfit to live on if things come
to that.
Consider other militarizing developments as well. On February 14, 2008, the
US and Canada agreed to allow American troops inside Canada. Canadians were told
nothing of this agreement, which was drafted in 2002. Neither was it discussed
in Congress or in the Canadian House of Commons. The agreement establishes
“bilateral integration” of military command structures in areas of immigration,
law enforcement, intelligence, or whatever else the Pentagon or Washington
wishes. Overall, it’s part of the “war on terror” and militarizing the continent
to make it “safer” for business and being prepared for any civilian opposition.
Mexico is also being targeted, with a “Plan Mexico” a Mexican and Central American security plan called the
Merida Initiative, supported by $1.4 billion in allocated aid. It’s a
“regional security cooperation initiative” similar to Plan Colombia and
presented as an effort to fight drug trafficking.
In fact, the Merida Initiative is part of SPP’s militarization of Mexico and
gives Washington more control of the country. Most of the aid goes to Mexico’s
military and police forces, with a major portion earmarked for US defense
contractors for equipment, training, and maintenance. The touchy issue of
deploying US troops will be avoided by instead employing private US security
forces, i.e., Blackwater and DynCorp.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at
[email protected].
Also visit his blog at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global Research
News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org, Mondays from 11 am to 1 pm CT.
Global Research, August 2, 2007
Title: “North American Union: The SPP is
a ‘hostile takeover’ of democratic government and an end to the Rule of Law”
Author: Constance Fogal
Student Researchers: Rebecca Newsome and Andrea Lochtefeld
Faculty Evaluator: Ron Lopez, PhD